PART 1 REALITY CHECK: CAN VICTIMS BE PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HARM THEY SUFFER?
1. Victim's conduct in criminal law and criminology
2. Why does criminal law needs a generic defense of comparative criminal liability?
PART 2 TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL LIABILITY
3. What happens to victim's rights in situations of consent, self-defense and provocation?
4. The principle of conditionality of rights
PART 3 INCORPORATING THE PRINCIPLE OF CONDITIONALITY OF RIGHTS INTO CRIMINAL LAW
5. How long do victim's rights remain limited?
6. The defense of comparative criminal liability.
1. Victim's conduct in criminal law and criminology
2. Why does criminal law needs a generic defense of comparative criminal liability?
PART 2 TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL LIABILITY
3. What happens to victim's rights in situations of consent, self-defense and provocation?
4. The principle of conditionality of rights
PART 3 INCORPORATING THE PRINCIPLE OF CONDITIONALITY OF RIGHTS INTO CRIMINAL LAW
5. How long do victim's rights remain limited?
6. The defense of comparative criminal liability.