목차 일부
PART ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND =1
A. SUBJECT AND METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY =3
I. ON THE SUBJECT =3
II. ON METHOD =11
B. PARAMETERS =15
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS =15
II. EQUALITY =1...
목차 전체
PART ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND =1
A. SUBJECT AND METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY =3
I. ON THE SUBJECT =3
II. ON METHOD =11
B. PARAMETERS =15
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS =15
II. EQUALITY =17
III. DISCRIMINATION =40
IV. RESTRICTIONS IN A WIDER SENSE =75
V. WHAT IS AN EQUALITY OR NON-DISCRIMINATION RULE FOR THE PRESENT PURPOSES? =77
VI. SUMMARY OF THE MOST IMPORTANT POINTS =85
C. HISTORICAL PRECURSORS OF THE CONCEPT OF INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION =89
I. HISTORIC ORIGINS IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW =89
II. THE DISPARATE IMPACT DOCTRINE IN U.S. LAW =91
III. EUROPEAN PRECURSORS: UK AND IRISH LAW =95
IV. THE FIRST EXPLICIT REFERENCE IN THE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES: GEITLING =96
PART TWO: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGAL CONCEPT OF INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION IN EC LAW =99
A. THE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH CASE LAW =101
I. RECOGNITION OF THE POSSIBILITY THAT DISCRIMINATION CAN BE OF AN INDIRECT NATURE =101
II. OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION =183
III. SOME BASIC OVERALL FINDINGS =205
IV. ISSUES FOR DEBATE ARISING FROM THE CASE LAW DEFINITION =214
B. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGAL DEFINITIONS =279
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS =279
II. CODIFICATION: THE BURDEN OF PROOF DIRECTIVE (SEX DISCRIMINATION) =280
III. A NEW GENERATION =284
IV. COMPARISON AND FINDINGS =296
PART THREE: DEMARCATIONS =305
A. DIRECT AND INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION =307
I. PRELIMINARY REMARKS =307
II. DEMARCATION ON THE CONCEPTUAL LEVEL =307
III. APPLYING THE CONCEPTS IN CONCRETE CASES =333
IV. OVERALL CONCLUSION: A RATHER UNCLEAR DIVIDING LINE =368
B. INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION AND RESTRICTIONS IN A WIDER SENSE =371
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: APPROACHING A VAGUE DIVIDING LINE =371
II. WHY A NEW APPROACH? =372
III. ON THE CONCEPTUAL LEVEL: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN EFFECT? =389
IV. ASSESSING CONCRETE CASES =397
V. OVERALL CONCLUSION: A VERY VAGUE DIVIDING LINE =417
C. DO WE STILL NEED THE CONCEPT OF INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION? =419
I. RECALLING THE STARTING POINT AND THE MAIN FINDINGS =419
II. WHAT APPROACH FOR THE FUTURE? =421
TABLES =437
서평 (0 건)
*주제와 무관한 내용의 서평은 삭제될 수 있습니다.
서평추가